ArticleBMC medical education2026
Implementation and effectiveness of an interprofessional educational intervention on patient safety in perinatal care: a multi-method, prospective evaluation study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterprofessional collaboration is fundamental to high-quality and safe care - particularly in perinatal care. Interprofessional education (IPE) for students in healthcare professions has significant potential for enhancing interprofessional competencies and patient safety. However, current evidence on effectiveness of IPE is limited, particularly due to various methodological constraints in evaluation studies such as a lack of prospective data, structured outcome measures, and student involvement.
methodsIn our project SiGerinn, students from nursing, midwifery, and medicine received IPE on patient safety. We employed a prospective, multi-method evaluation study over a two-year implementation period. Structured surveys on self-reported competency levels among program participants were collected at baseline and follow-up, complemented by in-depth interviews with stakeholders to assess the project's implementation status.
resultsProspective statistical analyses revealed highly significant improvements in competency levels for interprofessional collaboration, communication with patients and relatives, and interprofessional communication techniques. Competency gains varied across student groups, being highest among midwifery students. Moreover, survey and interview statements revealed strong acceptance and perceived benefits from the IPE patient safety intervention. Interview findings further emphasised the uptake of a disseminating role among participating students by peer knowledge sharing.
conclusionOur results show positive effects on skill development and encouragement through an IPE intervention on patient safety in perinatal care. Despite several methodological limitations such as small sample sizes, consensus-based outcome measures, and self-reported skill level assessments, our findings provide a starting point for future IPE attempts on patient safety education in clinical settings. Furthermore, obtained insights suggest the value of integrating IPE into health professionals' curricula to initiate sustainable learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.