ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Machine learning approach to analyzing complex care coordination patterns for medically complex children.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of children with medical complexity (CMC) in Japan has exceeded 20,000, doubling over the past 15 years, forming a significant population group internationally. While care coordination for CMC requires consideration of growth and school attendance, the relatively small population size compared to elderly care makes it challenging for care coordinators to gain sufficient experience. We investigated whether machine learning models could assist in care coordination for CMC.
methodsWe developed three tree-based gradient boosting prediction models using 1,042 care sheets from a pediatric respite facility. The first model estimated ventilator use to verify if care patterns could predict symptoms; the second predicted home doctor utilization to examine if symptoms could indicate required care; and the third estimated age to analyze school-related care needs. SHAP values were used to interpret feature importance in the prediction models. Each model was independently created and validated ten times to account for potential sampling bias among respite facility users.
resultsThe highest F1 scores for the three models were 0.83, 0.826, and 0.829, respectively. The ventilator model identified equipment maintenance services as highly significant; the home doctor model revealed patterns in complex service utilization; and the age model demonstrated varying important factors across school-age transitions.
conclusionThis study highlights AI's potential in identifying crucial factors related to CMC services and its effectiveness as a valuable tool for service coordination. Despite the limited dataset of 1,042 cases, our findings emphasize the importance of digital preservation of CMC healthcare information.
trial registrationRetrospectively registered. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.