Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426786›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2026

Making scents of mosquito lures: semiochemical attractants for adult mosquitoes.

Nyasha K T Thomas, Colin Berry, Islam S Sobhy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nyasha K T ThomasSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. thomasnk1@cardiff.ac.uk.
Colin BerrySchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Islam S SobhySchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation NE/X016714/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases continue to pose a global health threat, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. As increasing insecticide resistance and ecological concerns challenge traditional vector control methods, semiochemical attractants have emerged as a promising enhancement for surveillance and population management. This review compiles recent advances in the chemical ecology of adult mosquitoes, focusing on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that influence key behaviours: sugar foraging, blood-feeding, mating and oviposition. We assess the behavioural relevance, chemical composition and experimental validation of attractant blends across major mosquito vector genera, including Aedes, Anopheles and Culex. Special attention is given to host- and microbe-derived VOCs, pathogen-modulated odours, plant-based lures and conspecific cues. By comparing the efficacy of synthetic and natural attractants and highlighting methodological limitations in VOC collection and testing, we identify knowledge gaps and propose directions for developing species- and context-specific lures. This comprehensive review provides a foundation for integrating attractant-based tools into sustainable vector control strategies.

Indexed as

CulicidaeMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsOdorantsPheromonesVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsMosquito-Borne DiseasesOvipositionSexual Behavior, Animalinsect attractantsPheromonesVolatile Organic CompoundsBehaviourForagingMatingOdourOvipositionTrapVector control

Identifiers

PMID42426786
PMCPMC13647641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.