ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Cardiological aspects of Fabry disease: from diagnosis to therapeutic efficacy assessment.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFabry disease (FD) is a rare inborn error of metabolism in which absent or deficient activity of α-galactosidase A leads to lysosomal dysfunction and globotriaosylceramide accumulation in different organs, including the heart. FD is characterized by a broad clinical spectrum, but Fabry cardiomyopathy represents the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging are the cornerstones to suspect and diagnose cardiac involvement and to monitor it. Cardiac biomarkers such as troponin and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide are also used to ascertain the degree of cardiac involvement. However, definitive data are lacking on how to plan the follow-up of patients with or without cardiac involvement, when to initiate specific therapy, and when to switch from one treatment to another. Current proposals suggest initiating treatment when there is evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy but before fibrosis develops. MAIN BODY: Ten experts on FD met in Milan on March 8, 2024. The panel of experts was selected based on their expertise and contribution to the literature on FD. The group deliberated on appropriate parameters for cardiac assessment at diagnosis and during follow-up. The panel discussed developing a multiparametric cardiac assessment system (including ECG, laboratory biomarkers, echocardiographic and CMR parameters) to be used in clinical practice to guide management and monitor treatment response. The authors defined the requirements of such a system and advocate for the research needed to build and validate it. The experts also proposed a multiparametric clinical pathway for cardiac assessment, treatment initiation, and follow-up, designed to support routine clinical decisions. This was intended as general guidance, acknowledging that clinicians should tailor management to the individual patient's specific characteristics - a principle of particular importance in rare diseases such as FD, where organ involvement and treatment response can differ substantially among individuals.
conclusionSince cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in FD, an agreed staging system for evaluating cardiac progression is urgently needed. Further research should be carried out to confirm the criteria of a cardiac assessment system, evaluate its prognostic and predictive validity, and ensure its reliability and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.