ArticleBMC nursing2026
Visualization analysis of research progress in precision oncology nursing based on CiteSpace.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo map the knowledge structure, patterns of research attention, and temporal trends of precision oncology nursing in Chinese- and English-language literature.
methodsPublications related to precision oncology nursing were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Web of Science (WOS) from database inception to July 7, 2025. After literature screening, bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping were performed using CiteSpace 6.4.R1.
resultsA total of 613 publications were included, comprising 292 Chinese-language and 321 English-language records. Publication output increased in both datasets, although the English-language literature emerged earlier. Common themes across the two datasets included quality of life, breast cancer, and symptom-related care. Compared with the English-language literature, the Chinese-language literature placed greater emphasis on perioperative management and application-oriented nursing practice, whereas the English-language literature showed relatively greater attention to survivorship, patient education, palliative care, and evidence-informed care.
conclusionResearch on precision oncology nursing has expanded over time and shows increasing thematic diversity. However, collaboration networks remain relatively fragmented, particularly in the Chinese-language literature. Further efforts in interdisciplinary integration, methodological standardization, and international collaboration may support the future development of precision oncology nursing across the cancer care continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.