ArticleBMC medical education2026
Development and evaluation of a digital simulation tool for teaching gynecological cytology: a pilot study with nursing students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraining in gynecological cytology within nursing education presents challenges, including limited opportunities for practical experience and a lack of empirically evaluated educational tools. Digital simulation may offer a structured and safe approach to support learning, learner engagement, and practical preparation. This study aimed to develop and evaluate PapSim, a digital simulation tool for teaching gynecological cytology to nursing students.
methodsA pilot educational study was conducted with 40 second-year nursing students following a theoretical session on gynecological cytology. Participants engaged with the PapSim prototype in a supervised laboratory setting. Emotional engagement was assessed using a structured questionnaire based on the Pleasure Framework. Participants rated each emotional dimension on a six-point (0-5) ordinal response scale. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and through Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Qualitative responses were examined using thematic content analysis.
resultsHigher mean scores were observed in the categories of Simulation (4.63), Discovery (4.60), and Exploration (4.48), indicating strong engagement with immersive and task-oriented dimensions. Lower scores were reported in Danger (0.78) and Subversion (1.23), reflecting perceptions of safety and appropriateness. Significant positive correlations were identified between Discovery and Competition (ρ = 0.69, p < 0.001), as well as between sensory and empathic dimensions. Qualitative findings reinforced participants' perceptions of realism, cognitive stimulation, and spontaneous peer interaction during the simulation.
conclusionsThe PapSim prototype was positively perceived and well accepted by nursing students, supporting its use as a complementary educational tool for teaching gynecological cytology. Further studies involving larger and more diverse samples are warranted to evaluate educational outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.