ArticleBMC nursing2026
Effects of a generative AI-assisted ADPIE Framework on critical thinking, learning self-efficacy, and clinical reasoning in nursing education: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe nursing process is a systematic, patient-centered framework essential for clinical reasoning and decision-making in nursing education. It is commonly operationalized through the ADPIE (Assessment, Diagnosis, Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation) model, which guides nurses in identifying patient needs, developing care plans, implementing interventions, and evaluating outcomes in a structured and iterative manner. Although the nursing process is fundamental to nursing education and practice, some students may experience difficulties in applying ADPIE effectively, particularly the aspects of clinical reasoning and reflective practice.
methodsThis was a quasi-experimental study conducted to compare the effects of a Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)-assisted nursing process approach with traditional instruction on nursing students' evidence-based critical thinking, learning self-efficacy, and self-reported clinical reasoning. Moreover, the study integrated the intervention into a second-year nursing course (i.e., nursing process via obstetric nursing internship) as part of formal curriculum activities.
resultsStudents who participated in the GenAI-assisted nursing process approach demonstrated higher levels of evidence-based critical thinking, improved learning self-efficacy, and enhanced self-reported clinical reasoning ability compared with those in the traditional instruction group. The GenAI system provided adaptive feedback, real-time scaffolding, and iterative case refinement beyond traditional case-based learning.
conclusionsIntegrating GenAI into the ADPIE framework within nursing education may enhance students' critical thinking, learning self-efficacy, and self-reported clinical reasoning by supporting structured and reflective learning processes, offering a promising pedagogical approach for nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.