Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426731›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2026

Determinants of health literacy in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies (2001-2024).

Rostam Menati, Taha Ashayeri, Walieh Menati

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rostam MenatiPsychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3234-207X
Taha AshayeriDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of social science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Islamic Republic of Iran. t.ashayeri@uma.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8210-8899
Walieh MenatiPsychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Islamic Republic of Iran. waliehmenati@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4425-7492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy is a critical social determinant of health and a key lever for reducing health inequities. Understanding its determinants is essential for designing effective public health interventions.

objectiveThis study aimed to synthesize quantitative evidence on the individual- and contextual-level determinants of health literacy among the Iranian population.

methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Iranian databases (SID, Magiran) for observational and interventional studies published between January 2001 and December 2024. Eligible studies used quantitative designs, assessed health literacy using validated instruments (e.g., HLS-Iran, TOFHLA), were conducted among Iranian populations, and reported sufficient statistical data to calculate effect sizes. Two independent reviewers conducted screening and data extraction; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Study quality was appraised using STROBE and CONSORT checklists. Effect sizes were harmonized as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled using random-effects models (REML) in Stata version 16.0. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and Cochran's Q. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed where applicable.

resultsNinety-seven primary studies were included. Among demographic determinants, educational attainment showed the largest association (k=18; g=0.65, 95% CI: 0.55-0.75), followed by urban residence (k=10; g=0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.48); age, gender, and marital status showed small and imprecise associations. Psychological determinants showed strong positive associations, particularly self-efficacy (k=12; g=0.58, 95% CI: 0.46-0.70) and self-esteem (k=9; g=0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.63), whereas social-geographic isolation was negatively associated (k=7; g=-0.38, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.24). Among cultural determinants, digital literacy (k=8; g=0.52, 95% CI: 0.40-0.64) and cultural capital (k=7; g=0.47, 95% CI: 0.36-0.58) were positively associated, while traditional lifestyle adherence showed a negative association (k=6; g=-0.31, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.18). Economic determinants revealed that household income was positively associated (k=13; g=0.48, 95% CI: 0.36-0.60), whereas the Gini coefficient (k=8; g=-0.42, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.29) and inflation (k=5; g=-0.28, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.16) were negatively associated. Among social determinants, quality of life showed the strongest positive association (k=14; g=0.60, 95% CI: 0.50-0.70), followed by social support in healthcare (k=11; g=0.45, 95% CI: 0.35-0.55). Moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity was observed across most estimates (I²: 46%-63%). Sensitivity analyses and Egger tests did not reveal significant changes in estimates or consistent publication bias.

conclusionHealth literacy in Iran is shaped by a complex interplay of psychological, socio-economic, cultural, and geographic factors, with education, quality of life, self-efficacy, and digital literacy emerging as the strongest determinants. Multilevel interventions-spanning educational development, digital inclusion, poverty reduction, psychosocial support, and community engagement-are needed to address these determinants and advance health equity.

Indexed as

Health LiteracySocial Determinants of HealthHumansIranDigital literacyHealth equityHealth literacyIranMeta-analysisSocial determinants of healthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42426731
PMCPMC13637230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.