SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Association between serum uric acid levels and COPD: a meta-analysis and mendelian randomization study.
Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a major global health burden, but its relationship with serum uric acid (SUA) remains controversial. This study combined meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the observational association and potential causal relationship between SUA and COPD.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Data for observational studies comparing SUA levels between COPD patients and healthy controls published up to December 2025. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), followed by subgroup analyses. This meta-analysis has been registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD420251234511. Two-sample bidirectional MR analysis was conducted using publicly available GWAS summary data, with inverse variance weighting (IVW) as the primary method, supplemented by weighted median, MR-Egger regression, and sensitivity analyses.
resultsThe meta-analysis included 22 studies, comprising a total of 3739 COPD patients and 2778 healthy controls. Results showed that SUA levels were significantly higher in stable COPD patients compared to healthy controls (MD: 1.19 mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.83-1.55, P < 0.00001). Patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) exhibited even higher uric acid levels (MD: 1.30 mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.36-2.24, P < 0.00001), and SUA levels were significantly higher in severe COPD patients compared to those with mild-to-moderate COPD (MD: 1.18 mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.76-1.60, P = 0.02). Bidirectional MR analysis revealed that genetically predicted higher SUA levels were causally associated with reduced COPD risk (IVW: OR: 0.883, 95% CI: 0.811-0.961, P = 0.004). Reverse MR analysis found no significant causal effect of COPD on uric acid levels (P > 0.05). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the MR findings.
conclusionObservational evidence indicated elevated SUA in COPD, especially during exacerbations, while genetically predicted higher SUA showed a modest protective effect. These findings suggest a complex, dual role of uric acid. However, observational associations may be confounded by reverse causality, and the MR estimates-derived from East Asian populations-are method-sensitive. Current evidence does not yet support altering uric acid management in COPD, and further prospective and interventional studies across diverse populations are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.