SynthesisBMC public health2026
HIV vulnerability among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of individual social and structural determinants.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 15 to 24 years continue to bear a disproportionate burden of HIV infections in sub-Saharan Africa. Although substantial research has examined behavioral risk factors, evidence on how individual, interpersonal, and structural determinants interact to shape HIV vulnerability remains fragmented. A clearer synthesis of these intersecting determinants is essential for informing integrated HIV prevention strategies and guiding the implementation of emerging biomedical interventions such as long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis.
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five electronic databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL, were searched for peer reviewed studies examining determinants of HIV vulnerability among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Eligible studies included quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods designs reporting empirical evidence on factors associated with HIV vulnerability. Findings were synthesized using a social ecological framework. Meta analysis was conducted for determinants with comparable quantitative effect estimates.
resultsA total of 49 studies conducted across 18 countries were included. Of these, 12 studies contributed to quantitative synthesis, while the remaining studies contributed to narrative synthesis. Meta analysis showed that age discordant partnerships, transactional sex, and intimate partner violence were significantly associated with increased HIV vulnerability among AGYW, with pooled estimates indicating consistent elevated risk across studies. Across studies not included in meta-analysis, poverty, food insecurity, school dropout, and migration were consistently identified as structural drivers of vulnerability. At the individual level, low perceived susceptibility to HIV and inconsistent condom use were frequently reported risk behaviors, often influenced by gender power imbalance, partner control, and economic dependence.
conclusionHIV vulnerability among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa is driven by interacting behavioral, relational, and structural determinants. These findings highlight the need for integrated HIV prevention strategies that combine behavioral interventions with structural responses addressing poverty, gender inequality, and access to youth friendly health services. At the policy level, national HIV response frameworks should strengthen cross sector collaboration across health, education, and social protection systems to address the broader conditions that sustain vulnerability. Future research should prioritize longitudinal and implementation studies to better understand causal pathways and evaluate multilevel interventions across diverse contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.