ArticleBMC oral health2026
Comparison of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of contemporary composite resins in molars with extensive MOD cavities.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRestoring extensively damaged posterior teeth remains challenging due to reduced fracture resistance and potential marginal deterioration over time. Contemporary composite resins, including fiber-reinforced, injectable, and conventional materials, have been developed to improve mechanical performance and marginal integrity. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of thermo-mechanical aging on marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of these composite resins materials used in extensive Class II MOD cavities.
methodsSixty-five extracted mandibular molars were allocated to five groups (n = 13): intact control, G-ænial Posterior, GAP: G-ænial Universal Injectable, EXF: EverX Flow, or EXP: EverX Posterior (GC, Japan). Standardized MOD cavities were prepared, selectively etched, and restored using G-Premio Bond (GC, Japan). Aging was simulated using thermocycling and chewing simulation. Marginal adaptation was assessed by scanning electron microscopy before and after aging, and fracture resistance was tested after aging. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post-hoc, and Chi-square tests (p < 0.05).
resultsMarginal adaptation differed significantly among materials both before and after aging (p < 0.05). Aging increased marginal gaps in all groups, with the highest values in GUI and the lowest in EXP. EXF showed higher fracture resistance than GUI (p < 0.05). Restorability was highest for EXP and lowest for GAP, although the difference was not significant.
conclusionThermomechanical aging increased marginal gaps in all materials. EXF and EXP, showed more favorable marginal adaptation and higher fracture resistance than GUI and GAP. These materials may be considered a suitable option for restoring extensively damaged posterior teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.