ArticleBMC public health2026
The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on work participation, sickness absence and general practitioner consultations in the Danish population - a register-based matched cohort study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMany persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 experienced prolonged symptoms after the acute phase of the infection (long-COVID). We aimed to investigate whether SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the risk of long-term sickness absence, low work participation, and high use of general practitioners in persons in the Danish workforce.
methodsIn a register-based cohort study, we identified 261,325 persons from the workforce who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark. These were matched with persons who tested negative by time, sex, age, and industry and analysed with conditional logistic regression. The outcomes were long-term sickness absence, low work participation and high number of contacts to general practitioners, all measured during year 1 after test. We adjusted for work participation or contacts to general practitioners, both measured during year 1 before test, respectively, and for vaccination status, comorbidity, and educational level. We stratified the result by sex, age, and industry to identify any effect modification by these factors.
resultsMost persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 were not on long-term sickness absence (98.3%). However, compared to persons tested negative, SARS-CoV-2 infected had an increased risk of long-term sickness absence (Odds Ratio (OR):2.92[2.82;3.03]) and low work participation (OR:1.32[1.30;1.34]). The risk was higher among women and middle-aged and older persons. Furthermore, the risk was highest in public administration, education and health services, culture and arts, and lowest in agriculture, forestry and fishing. We found an increased risk of high number of contacts to general practitioners among SARS-CoV-2 infected (OR:1.61[1.60;1.63]), however more uniformly distributed across subgroups.
conclusionInfection with SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a higher risk of long-term sickness absence, low work participation and high number of contacts to general practitioners during year 1 after test. The associations differed across sex, age and industry, especially in relation to sickness absence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.