ArticleBMC public health2026
Type 2 diabetes risk and health-promoting behaviours among health sciences students: a cross-sectional analysis using FINDRISC and HPLP-II.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus has continued to increase, and early signs of behavioural risk are now being detected even in young adults. Understanding these risks in student populations is important for the development of early prevention strategies. This study aimed to evaluate type 2 diabetes risk and investigate its association with health-promoting behaviour domains, body mass index, and selected demographic characteristics among health sciences students.
methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out during the 2023-2024 academic year with 260 students enrolled in health sciences programmes. Data were gathered through a sociodemographic form, FINDRISC, and the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II). Anthropometric measurements (weight, height, waist circumference) were obtained using standard procedures. Descriptive analyses, correlation analyses, and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted to examine associations between FINDRISC scores and demographic characteristics, body mass index, and HPLP-II subdomains.
resultsThe sample included 260 students (mean age: 23.63 ± 4.38 years; 68.8% female) from nutrition and dietetics, nursing, and social work programs. The mean FINDRISC score was 5.50 ± 3.56, and 70.4% of students were classified as low risk. The mean HPLP-II total score (122.52 ± 30.79) suggested a moderate level of health-promoting behaviours, with the highest scores in spiritual growth and interpersonal relations and the lowest in physical activity and stress management. Although overall HPLP-II scores were not significantly correlated with FINDRISC scores, specific subdomains, particularly physical activity, showed significant associations after adjustment for demographic characteristics and body mass index. Higher BMI was associated with increased FINDRISC scores (B = 0.431, p < 0.001), whereas higher physical activity scores were associated with lower FINDRISC scores (B = -0.159, p = 0.011). The model explained 27.3% of the variance (adjusted R² = 0.273).
conclusionAlthough the students generally reported moderate levels of health-promoting behaviour, higher body mass index and lower physical activity levels were associated with higher diabetes risk scores in this group. These findings suggest that universities may benefit from supporting students in developing sustainable physical activity habits and maintaining healthy body weight as part of diabetes risk prevention strategies. Further longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the direction and underlying mechanisms of these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.