ArticleBMC cancer2026
The value of dual-energy computed tomography quantitative parameters in differentiating the sensitivity of small lymph nodes to chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) quantitative parameters in differentiating the sensitivity of small lymph nodes (short-axis diameter 5-9 mm) that are negative on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
methodsNewly diagnosed NPC patients underwent DECT before treatment. The reference standard was the radiographic regression status of lymph nodes at 1 year after radiotherapy. They were classified into the effective disease (ED) group and the stable disease (SD) group based on their sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy. The characteristics of small lymph nodes, DECT parameters, and diagnostic value were compared.
resultsOne year after radiotherapy, 65 and 60 small lymph nodes were detected in the ED and SD groups, respectively; the proportion of small lymph nodes in the lower neck was higher in the ED group than in the SD group, and all such nodes achieved complete response (CR). Normalized iodine concentration (NIC), and slope of the energy spectrum (λHU) were independent risk factors for differentiating the sensitivity of small lymph nodes to chemoradiotherapy (P < 0.05). In the venous phase, λHU demonstrated the strongest diagnostic performance among all DECT parameters, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.803 and an optimal cutoff value of 4.465. The diagnostic power of the combined parameters was higher, especially when the short-axis diameter of small lymph nodes was 7-9 mm, the location was in the lower neck, and λHU was > 4.46 in the venous phase; the diagnostic power AUC of the combined parameters reached 0.870.
conclusionDECT quantitative parameters can effectively assess the sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy of MRI-negative small lymph nodes in NPC and aid in evaluating metastatic risk. λHU in the venous phase is the most reliable single DECT parameter. Combining short-axis diameter and nodal region provides an optimized reference for metastatic risk assessment of small lymph nodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.