ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Visualization of coronary small branch at ultra-high field 5T Noncontrast Dixon Whole-Heart Coronary MR Angiography: compared with 3T MRI.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetection of the small coronary branches using 5T Dixon (5TDixon) sequence, analysis of visualization and performance comparison with 3T Dixon (3TDixon) sequence. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective study was conducted involving 22 healthy adult volunteers (mean age, 25 years ± 3 [SD]; twelve male participants) who underwent navigator-gated three-dimensional MR angiography at both 5TDixon and 3TDixon. The visualization rates, image quality scores and visualized lengths of the small coronary branches were quantitatively compared between 5TDixon and 3TDixon sequences.
resultsThe 5TDixon sequence demonstrated superior performance to the 3TDixon sequence, yielding a significantly shorter scan time (10.01 ± 3.17 min vs. 13.71 ± 3.36 min, P = 0.002), a significantly higher SNR
conclusion5T Non-contrast Dixon Whole-Heart Coronary MR Angiography provides an effective tool for visualizing small coronary branches and demonstrates superior performance compared with 3T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.