ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Ethephon as a bloom-delaying agent for frost-sensitive tree crop flowers at risk from a changing climate.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change increases the risk of late spring frosts, which damage flowers and developing fruitlets in tree crops. Ethephon, a plant growth regulator, may delay flowering and potentially reduce frost damage.
methodsWe investigated the effects of ethephon on flowering time and fruit set in two sweet cherry (Bellise and Kordia) and two apple cultivars (Elstar and Kanzi). Treatments included two ethephon concentrations (500 and 750 ppm) applied either in early or late autumn.
resultsEthephon significantly delayed flowering in cherry cultivar Kordia, but not cultivar Bellise, with a lower proportion of Kordia floral buds in bloom in two of four treatments compared to controls. Specifically, on 9 April 88% of floral buds on control trees were in bloom, compared to 56% and 63% on trees treated with high ethephon in early autumn and low ethephon in late autumn, respectively. No significant flowering delay was observed in the apple cultivars. Initial and final fruit set were generally unaffected, although Kordia showed a reduction in final fruit set from 16 to 6% after the late-high treatment.
conclusionsOur results indicate that ethephon can effectively delay bloom without major yield loss, offering a practical tool to mitigate spring frost damage under climate change. However, its effectiveness was crop- and cultivar-dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.