Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426576›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2026

Cell-based crop phenotyping for future climates.

Sergey Shabala, Ping Yun, Zhong-Hua Chen, Meixue Zhou, Min Yu, Nadia Bazihizina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergey ShabalaInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8981
Ping YunSchool of Biological Sciences and ARC Training Centre for Smart and Sustainable Horticulture, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-0683
Zhong-Hua ChenSchool of School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, Adelaide University, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7531-320X
Meixue ZhouTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7771-3151
Min YuInternational Research Centre for Environmental Membrane Biology, Foshan University, Foshan, 528041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-0013
Nadia BazihizinaDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, 50121, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4856-0659

Funding

111 Program D26025Australian Research Council IC240100041National Natural Science Foundation of China 31961143001National Natural Science Foundation of China 42377042University of Western Australia 2024/GR001434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stress tolerance has been significantly weakened in modern crops during the domestication process. Regaining tolerance has become a critical task in light of current climate trends and their impact on global food security. Abiotic stress tolerance is an extremely complex trait and is conferred at various levels of plant functional organization and developmental stages, with regulatory mechanisms operating across multiple scales, from individual cells to tissues and the entire plant. The emergence of advanced molecular tools such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial omics technologies has revolutionized the field, advancing our understanding of plant responses to hostile environments. However, the implementation of this knowledge in crop breeding programmes is handicapped by the lack of appropriate phenotyping platforms. Here, we argue that current phenotyping methods may be excellent tools for functional validation of previously discovered traits but have limited predictive value in stress biology. We also propose that bridging the mismatch between omics technologies and phenotyping is the only way to account for cell-specific operation of key genes conferring stress tolerance and implementing them in breeding programmes. Some practical examples using cell-based phenotyping tools such as fluorescence dyes or electrophysiological methods are given, and current limitations and prospects of cell-based phenotyping are discussed.

Indexed as

ClimateCrops, AgriculturalPhenotypePlant BreedingStress, Physiologicalabiotic stressclimate changedroughtsalinitysoil floodingspatial omics

Identifiers

PMID42426576
PMCPMC13583381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.