ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Cell-based crop phenotyping for future climates.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abiotic stress tolerance has been significantly weakened in modern crops during the domestication process. Regaining tolerance has become a critical task in light of current climate trends and their impact on global food security. Abiotic stress tolerance is an extremely complex trait and is conferred at various levels of plant functional organization and developmental stages, with regulatory mechanisms operating across multiple scales, from individual cells to tissues and the entire plant. The emergence of advanced molecular tools such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial omics technologies has revolutionized the field, advancing our understanding of plant responses to hostile environments. However, the implementation of this knowledge in crop breeding programmes is handicapped by the lack of appropriate phenotyping platforms. Here, we argue that current phenotyping methods may be excellent tools for functional validation of previously discovered traits but have limited predictive value in stress biology. We also propose that bridging the mismatch between omics technologies and phenotyping is the only way to account for cell-specific operation of key genes conferring stress tolerance and implementing them in breeding programmes. Some practical examples using cell-based phenotyping tools such as fluorescence dyes or electrophysiological methods are given, and current limitations and prospects of cell-based phenotyping are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.