SynthesisThe oncologist2026
Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHER2 amplification identifies a subgroup of colorectal cancer with poorer prognosis and resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of available data on anti-HER2 treatments (HER2Tx) in mCRC patients (pts).
methodsA systematic literature search was performed, encompassing phase II/III clinical trials (CTs) investigating HER2Tx in HER2-overexpressed mCRC. CTs reporting HER2Tx plus chemotherapy were excluded. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Fixed and random-effect models were applied according to heterogeneity assessed through I 2 statistics. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared descriptively and pooled using the weighted median of medians (WM) with approximated 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses by HER2Tx were carried out.
resultsThe analysis included 10 CTs evaluating Trastuzumab-Pertuzumab (T + P, 5 CTs,), Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd, 2 CTs), Trastuzumab-Lapatinib (T + L, 1 CT), Pertuzumab-TDM1 (P+TDM1, 1 CT), and Trastuzumab-Tucatinib (T-Tu, 1 CT), for a total of 467 pts. The pooled ORR was 33.7% (29.6%-38.1%), and the pooled DCR was 68.5% (58.1%-77.4%). The WM OS was 13.4 months (10-24.1) and WM PFS was 5.5 months (4.1-6.9). The T-DX and T-Tu groups showed higher ORR and DCR (38% and 39% respectively, 85.1% and 73.2% respectively) compared to the T + P group (ORR, 30%; DCR, 52.6%).
conclusionsHER2Tx demonstrated efficacy in pretreated CRC pts, exhibiting good DCR and ORR alongside promising PFS and OS. T-DXd and T-Tu appear to outperform T + P; however, further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.