Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426539›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

What contributes to our perception of the Shepard Tabletop Illusion?

Irene Sperandio, Bianca Maria Monti, Margherita Piazza, Saman Kamari Songhorabadi, Federica Debernardis, Debra Griffiths, Philippe A Chouinard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irene SperandioDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy. irene.sperandio@unitn.it.
Bianca Maria MontiDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Margherita PiazzaDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Saman Kamari SonghorabadiDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Federica DebernardisDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Debra GriffithsSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Philippe A ChouinardDepartment of Psychology, Counselling, and Therapy, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vertical parallelogram placed next to an identical one but rotated horizontally by 90 degrees gives rise to one of the most powerful geometrical illusions: the Shepard Tabletop Illusion. In this illusion, the two parallelograms, or tabletops, are perceived as having different aspect ratios: the vertical one appears longer and thinner than the horizontal one. Although the exact mechanisms responsible for the illusion remain unclear, it is commonly understood that the brain treats the vertical tabletop as a three-dimensional object receding into the distance, and the horizontal one as an object closer in view. Here, we investigated the role of depth cues, texture, shape constancy, mental rotation, and autistic-like traits in the illusion. Using the method of adjustment, we measured susceptibility to four variants of the illusion: (i) plain parallelograms; (ii) plain tables; (iii) wood-like parallelograms; (iv) wood-like tables. We also measured participants' shape constancy and mental rotation abilities, along with autistic-like traits. The results revealed that illusion strength increased with the inclusion of additional depth cues but decreased when wood-grain texture was added to the table configurations. Additionally, illusion strength correlated with mental rotation but not with shape constancy abilities. Also, there were instances in which illusion strength decreased with an increase in autistic-like traits. These findings demonstrate that the Shepard Tabletop Illusion cannot be explained solely by theories of depth perception. Processes related to the analysis of low-level visual features and mental rotation, as well as individual differences in autistic-like traits, seem to play a role as well.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionForm PerceptionOptical IllusionsPattern Recognition, VisualAdultAutistic DisorderCuesFemaleHumansMaleOrientationYoung AdultAutism-spectrum Quotient (AQ)Low-level featuresMental rotationShape constancyShepard Tabletop Illusion

Identifiers

PMID42426539
PMCPMC13350102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.