ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Dual-view fusion of log-mel spectrogram encodings for dysarthria detection: use in the context of awake brain surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative speech monitoring during awake glioma surgery is critical to detect stimulation-induced motor speech impairments such as dysarthria. However, automatic detection from short speech segments remains challenging due to limited annotations, strong acoustic variability, and transient impairments in operating-room conditions. This study investigates whether combining complementary encodings of the same log-mel representation can improve robustness under such constraints.
methodsWe propose a dual-branch EfficientNet-B0 architecture that processes two complementary views of each log-mel spectrogram: (i) a numeric amplitude-preserving representation stored as NPY, and (ii) an RGB spectrogram image stored as PNG using a fixed colormap. The resulting embeddings are fused using four strategies: naïve concatenation, attention-based fusion, and gated fusion (sigmoid and GRU-style). Models are evaluated under two settings: (i) intra-corpus group-wise cross-validation on TORGO (English, controlled) and DATABRASE (French, intraoperative), and (ii) cross-corpus transfer (TORGO
resultsIn intra-corpus evaluation, adaptive fusion strategies provide consistent benefits on TORGO, with gated fusion achieving the highest AUC (0.852±0.087). On raw DATABRASE, the PNG unimodal baseline yields the best mean performance (UAR 0.830±0.132; AUC 0.889±0.109), whereas denoising altered the model ranking and improved the performance of attention-based fusion (UAR 0.854±0.106). Cross-corpus testing reveals a marked degradation for all methods, confirming a severe domain shift between TORGO and intraoperative speech.
conclusionDual-encoding fusion can enhance dysarthria detection when training and testing conditions are aligned and noise is controlled, but robust cross-corpus generalization remains unresolved. These results highlight both the potential and current limitations of spectrogram-based deep models for intraoperative speech monitoring, motivating future work on domain-adaptive and self-supervised learning tailored to clinical recordings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42426485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.