Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426418›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Machine Learning-Based Privacy Preserving via CT/MRI and Organ Metadata Prediction.

Riwei Jin, Salman Mohamadi, Matthew T Bramlet, Mark A Anastasio, Bradley P Sutton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riwei JinCoordinated Science Lab, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. jriwei2@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-1123
Salman MohamadiCoordinated Science Lab, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Matthew T BramletJump Simulation Center, OSF HealthCare, Peoria, IL, USA.
Mark A AnastasioBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Bradley P SuttonBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Funding

Health Care Engineering Systems Center, University of Illinois P402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging plays a significant role in diagnosis and treatment planning, with significant efforts focused on training machine learning (ML) algorithms to perform detection and classification automatically. However, concerns regarding patient privacy have prompted the need for robust deidentification of the data. In this paper, we consider a general scenario in which the data are entirely anonymized by removing the metadata due to privacy concerns. In several circumstances, efficient training of an arbitrary downstream ML model requires some prior information that is only accessible through metadata. To address this need, we propose a novel approach for automated metadata prediction from fully anonymized CT and MRI images to enable efficient training of the downstream model. Our method accurately identifies the imaging modality (CT or MRI) and anatomical region (heart, brain, or liver) directly from image data. Moreover, in case of MRI data, it allows for contrast classification into T1 and T2. Our framework employs a set of machine learning as well as deterministic techniques to perform these tasks, achieving high accuracy rates in distinguishing between CT and MRI scans and localizing anatomical regions, as well as classification of MRI imaging protocol, T1 and T2. By estimating technical metadata from anonymized data, our approach successfully combines multiple tasks into a unified framework designed for privacy-preserving workflows. We demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of our method through systematic experiments on medical imaging datasets. On held-out test sets, the framework achieved 100% accuracy for CT/MRI modality detection; 99.2% accuracy for anatomical region classification across brain, heart, and liver volumes (125/126 correctly classified); and 99.8% accuracy for MRI T1/T2 protocol classification (500/501 correctly classified). The proposed framework represents a new direction toward full privacy protection in medical imaging with no impact on the selection of appropriate image processing frameworks in the downstream tasks.

Indexed as

De-identified dataMachine learningMedical imagingMetadata retrievalPrivacy preservation

Identifiers

PMID42426418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.