ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients dialyzed by ADVanced Organ Support compared to conventional continuous renal replacement therapy.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDosing of antibiotics proves to be both crucial and especially challenging in critically ill patients due to extracorporeal therapies. In this exploratory study, we compared the influence of the albumin based ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system to conventional continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) on linezolid serum concentrations.
methodsA total of 14 critically ill patients (8 ADVOS, 6 CVVHD) receiving linezolid 600 mg twice daily were analyzed, comprising 22 measurement cycles. Machine clearance was calculated by pre- and post-filter concentrations; total and patient clearance were estimated by area under the curve (AUC) calculations. Linezolid pharmacokinetics were evaluated by C
resultsMachine clearance was significantly higher in ADVOS than in CVVHD (median 3.4 vs. 1.6 L/h, p < 0.001), accounting for a higher share of total clearance (38.1% vs. 18.2%). Total clearance (9.3 vs. 10.4 L/h) and patient clearance (6.7 vs. 8.4 L/h) did not differ significantly, nor did AUC24 (250.9 vs. 221.2 mg·h/L) or Cmin (4.6 vs. 4.0 mg/L). A substantial proportion of subtherapeutic serum concentrations was observed in both groups (45.5% by AUC24 and 31.8% by Cmin).
conclusionThis in-vivo study provides real-life data of linezolid levels in ICU-patients treated with conventional CVVHD and ADVOS. The high occurrence of subtherapeutic serum concentrations and a significant difference in dialysis capacities depending on dialysis type indicate the necessity of a tailored therapeutic drug monitoring approach in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.