Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426353›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2026

Evaluation of targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing methods for forensic metagenomics.

Kamila Marszałek, Michał B Kowalski, Agata Jagiełło, Anna Woźniak, Kinga Herda, Rafał Płoski, Andrzej Ossowski, Manuela Oliveira, Renata Zbieć-Piekarska, Paweł P Łabaj and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kamila MarszałekJagiellonian University, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Kraków, Poland.
Michał B KowalskiJagiellonian University, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Kraków, Poland.
Agata JagiełłoCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna WoźniakCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
Kinga HerdaJagiellonian University, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Kraków, Poland.
Rafał PłoskiDepartment of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej OssowskiDepartment of Genomics and Forensic Genetics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Manuela OliveiraResearch Unit on Applied Molecular Biosciences, Forensic Sciences Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences-CESPU, Gandra, 4585-116, Portugal.
Renata Zbieć-PiekarskaCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł P ŁabajJagiellonian University, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Kraków, Poland.
Wojciech BranickiJagiellonian University, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Kraków, Poland. wojciech.branicki@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) is effective for monitoring the microbial composition of environmental samples. Soil microbial signatures are critical for pinpointing the geographic location of forensic evidence, but standard 16S rRNA methods lack species-level resolution. Targeted sequencing panels, consisting of informative DNA fragments, can overcome this shortcoming and are highly desirable for forensic investigations. To address this, we evaluated three target enrichment methods for metagenomic analysis. First, we used Whole Metagenome Sequencing (WMS) data from 134 soil samples across 46 locations in Poland to extract a set of 200 markers. Using these markers, we created prototype targeted sequencing panels to compare two amplicon capture-based methods (Thermo Fisher AmpliSeq™ and Integrated DNA Technologies xGen™) and one hybridization capture-based method (Roche KAPA HyperPlus). The comparison of the technologies was guided by the results of classification of sample origin by machine learning classifier trained on feature profiles from WMS. The methods were assessed on technical parameters including data quality, reproducibility, sensitivity, and practical implementation for forensic laboratories. The performance and precision varied depending on technology and DNA concentration. The Roche KAPA HyperPlus hybridization capture-based method consistently demonstrated superior performance. Across various DNA input quantities, it showed the highest correlation with WMS data and achieved an exceptional F1 score of 0.94 at 5 ng, significantly outperforming the amplicon-based methods. This indicates that hybridization capture is a more robust and accurate approach for forensic soil microbiome profiling, particularly for low-template evidence, providing a highly reliable tool for predicting geographic origin. KEY POINTS: • Targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing methods for forensic soil microbial analysis • Targeted sequencing allowed the determination of the place of origin of soil samples • Roche KAPA HyperPlus: the most accurate classification of the soil samples origin.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsSoil MicrobiologyMetagenomeReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16SForensic DNA intelligenceMassively Parallel SequencingMetagenomicsMicrobial forensicsSoil microbiomeTarget enrichment method

Identifiers

PMID42426353
PMCPMC13635074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.