ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Development of a Community-engaged Research Training Workshop for Clinician-Scientists and Early-stage Investigators.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-engaged research (CEnR), a collaboration between academics and community partners, is an effective approach in addressing the social drivers of health (SDOH) and health disparities in local communities. Yet, CEnR training is often not a standard component of training programs in research or clinical programs. To meet the need for CEnR training, we developed and implemented a workshop to increase CEnR knowledge and skills among clinician-scientists and early-stage investigators (ESIs), and create opportunities for ongoing mentorship and professional development. In this manuscript, we discuss the organization of this workshop, learning objectives, supporting activities, and follow-up methods to facilitate a successful and engaging training experience. The workshop was developed through collaborative efforts with experts in CEnR, Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR), cancer disparities, and SDOH. The workshop focused on (1) an introduction to CEnR and the opportunity for attendees to develop their own CEnR research ideas; (2) varied presentations, interactive activities, experiential learning, and discussion topics to fulfill the workshop's learning objectives; (3) year-long opportunities for professional development and continued mentorship; and (4) evaluations of the workshop. Twenty-four ESIs and 11 clinician-scientists participated in the workshop. Using survey methods and descriptive statistics, the workshop was evaluated positively by participants. This manuscript provides guidance for both in-person and virtual workshop formats, from inception to implementation, and recommendations for other workshop facilitators. The impact of these workshops has the potential to have positive downstream implications for community-engaged research.
Identifiers
42426323What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.