ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Neoadjuvant intraprostatic immunotherapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-risk localized prostate cancer is associated with substantial recurrence rates despite definitive treatment, and no neoadjuvant therapies are currently established. Investigation in this field has largely focused on systemic neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, which is associated with burdensome adverse effects and long-term morbidity. Intraprostatic immunotherapy is an emerging strategy designed to overcome local immune suppression and induce systemic antitumour responses through direct modulation of the tumour microenvironment. Early-phase clinical experience with viral-vector-based gene therapies has shown this approach to be safe, technically feasible and capable of eliciting local and systemic immune activation. Clinical efficacy remains unproven, with results from early-phase studies indicating variable responses in levels of prostate-specific antigen and pathological tumour regression. Nevertheless, these studies establish a proof-of-concept for localized immunomodulation before surgery. Further progress will require standardized biological and clinical end points and rational integration with contemporary treatment modalities.
Identifiers
42426291What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.