ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Sleep EEG foundation models reveal within-stage microstructure that improves health screening beyond traditional stages.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The DYNAM-O Toolbox: Characterizing Individualized Neural Signatures in Sleep EEG.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep physiology provides rich longitudinal biosignals reflecting integrated brain and systemic physiology, yet polysomnography is commonly compressed into coarse, human-defined stages. We asked whether self-supervised foundation models learn sleep EEG structure beyond traditional staging and encode enriched health information. Using 11,261 overnight recordings, we trained transformers on unlabeled sleep data and probed representations across diagnostic, demographic, and functional outcomes. Compared with architecture-matched transformers trained from random initialization on each downstream task, SSL pretraining improved performance across several outcomes. Compared with five-stage-supervised pretraining, EEG-only advantages were clearest for BMI and age, while differences for AHI, sex, and functional outcomes were smaller, nominal, or not reliable. In nested controls, EEG-derived self-supervised model scores retained incremental value beyond covariates, stage summaries, spectral summaries, and a matched five-stage representation. Embedding analyses show that models recover the stage scaffold without labels while preserving a higher-resolution, stage-anchored structure that carries task-specific health information beyond the five-stage interface.
Identifiers
42426257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.