Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42426130›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Perceptions on continuing medical education credit system: a cross-sectional study in Sichuan Province, China.

Xuedong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xuedong LiuDepartment of Medical Administration, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, No.1866, West Han'an Avenue, Shizhong District, Neijiang, 641000, China. scholarxuedongliu@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuing medical education (CME) credit system is a core and indispensable component of CME management. Despite its critical significance, empirical research on this system in China remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of CME administrators and healthcare professionals regarding the CME credit system in Sichuan Province, China. Combined on-site and online surveys were conducted using self-designed questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participants' demographic characteristics and CME administrators' perceptions on the credit system. Comparative analyses were performed using the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test, with the Bonferroni correction for post hoc pairwise comparisons. A total of 51 CME administrators and 590 healthcare professionals were enrolled. Administrators identified standardized credit verification and the development of a unified credit management information system as two top priorities. Nurses reported a significantly higher proportion of obtaining CME credits through off-disciplinary training than public health personnel (61.6% vs. 0.0%). Healthcare professionals at grassroots institutions showed the highest proportion of acquiring credits via off-disciplinary training, whereas those at provincial-level institutions had the lowest (85.5% vs. 3.6%). Grassroots staff also relied least on academic conferences for credits, while provincial-level staff relied most on this approach (56.6% vs. 100.0%). Conversely, grassroots staff exhibited the highest utilization of distance education while provincial-level staff showed the lowest (22.4% vs. 0.0%). Additionally, provincial-level professionals were much more likely to perceive current CME credit requirements as "too high", with grassroots professionals demonstrating the lowest tendency (57.1% vs. 23.7%). Compared with public hospital staff, professionals in private hospitals had higher proportions of prioritizing credit acquisition by attending CME activities (91.8% vs. 78.6%) and choosing off-disciplinary training (79.6% vs. 52.1%). CME administrators attached great importance to standardized credit verification and the construction of a unified information system. Nurses, as well as healthcare professionals working at grassroots and private medical institutions, commonly took off-disciplinary training to obtain mandatory credits, and grassroots professionals preferred distance education. In contrast, provincial-level professionals perceived current credit requirements as overly demanding. Private hospital professionals generally prioritized credit acquisition as the core motivation for CME participation. For CME administrative authorities, it is recommended to accelerate the development of a unified digital CME information platform, optimize credit rules for healthcare professionals across all institutional levels, rationalize the allocation of CME resources, and strengthen CME governance in private hospitals.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingHealth PersonnelAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesChinaContinuing medical educationCredit systemPerceptionSichuan

Identifiers

PMID42426130
PMCPMC13545217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.