ArticleScientific reports2026
Neural pattern stability within events is similar in young and older adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how the brain segments continuous experiences into discrete events is essential for uncovering the mechanisms of episodic memory. Here, we investigated whether stable neural representations are maintained within unfolding events, how these representations differ between young and older adults, and whether they predict later memory. Young (N = 42) and older adults (N = 42) watched a 35-min clip from BBC's Sherlock while EEG was recorded. Using representational similarity analysis, we quantified neural pattern similarity within events and across event boundaries. Neural similarity was significantly higher within events than across events, even after controlling for perceptual changes in the stimulus, indicating stable neural representations during ongoing experience. This within-event neural stability was observed in both young and older adults, although evidence was stronger in young adults. Despite robust neural effects, neither within- nor across-event neural similarity significantly predicted subsequent free recall at the event or subject level. These findings suggest that neural stability reflects top-down maintenance of coherent event representations during perception, rather than directly determining later recall success. Importantly, both age groups showed greater within-event than across-event neural similarity, but follow-up analyses did not provide sufficient evidence to conclude equivalence between younger and older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.