ArticleNature communications2026
Neural mechanisms of time-forward predictions for naturalistic auditory tone sequences.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of future events is essential for guiding effective actions in dynamic environments. Studies on the neural mechanisms for time-forward predictions have typically used stimuli with relatively simple statistical regularities. Here, we investigated time-forward predictions using stimuli containing statistical regularities similar to those found in natural auditory stimuli. Using intracranial EEG recordings in neurosurgical patients, we found that prediction signals were primarily carried by low-frequency activity across widespread cortical regions, including sensory, parietal, and frontal areas. Prediction-error (PE) signals were found in both low- and high-frequency activity, with high-frequency components localized mainly to sensory areas. Contrary to previous hypotheses, prediction and PE signals did not show a clear spatial or spectral segregation. Directed connectivity between brain regions decreased over the course of the stimulus sequence as predictability increased, except for pathways originating from the parietal cortex. These results reveal integrative and distributed predictive processing and highlight the dorsal auditory pathway in time-forward prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.