Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42425995›Full record

ReviewNPJ science of learning2026

Mapping the Montessori mathematics curriculum to Dehaene's four pillars of learning.

Chloë Marshall, Louise Livingston, Jo Van Herwegen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chloë MarshallCentre for Educational Neuroscience, University of London, London, UK. chloe.marshall@ucl.ac.uk.
Louise LivingstonCentre for Educational Neuroscience, University of London, London, UK.
Jo Van HerwegenCentre for Educational Neuroscience, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstraction is a crucial characteristic of human learning, and a fundamental question for education concerns how teachers can support learners to acquire abstract knowledge. We tackle this question through one particular case: the mathematics curriculum devised for 3 to 6-year-olds by Maria Montessori. We map this curriculum to Dehaene's Four Pillars of Learning (attention, active engagement, error feedback, consolidation), and we argue that the Montessori mathematics curriculum is aligned with well-established cognitive principles known to support learning.

Identifiers

PMID42425995
PMCPMC13620151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.