ArticleNature communications2026
Decoding cancer circulating transcriptomic signatures with language models.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding cancer circulating transcriptomic signatures with language models.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current liquid biopsy methods for multi-cancer detection using plasma cell-free RNA (cfRNA, short RNA fragments circulating in blood that can reflect disease states) typically rely on gene annotations, which can overlook signals from unannotated or repetitive genomic regions. We present GeneLLM, a Transformer-based model that directly processes the nucleotide sequences of human-mapped cfRNA reads to identify cancer-indicative signatures. By bypassing gene-level quantification, the model retains signals from transcriptomic dark matter. The model learns latent pseudo-biomarkers (prototype representations from aggregated cfRNA read embeddings) that serve as discriminative features for cancer classification, rather than corresponding to explicit genomic sequences. Here we show that, in a multi-centre cohort, GeneLLM achieves ROC-AUC values ranging from 0.9250 to 0.9962 across several cancers, while maintaining comparable performance at one-sixth of the typical sequencing depth. These results suggest that sequence-level modelling of plasma cfRNA can capture diagnostically relevant information beyond annotation-dependent approaches, enabling more cost-efficient and scalable cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.