Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42425988›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Pathways to cost competitive and viable lithium production from Salton Sea geothermal brines.

Jannis Wesselkaemper, Theo Renaud, Naod Araya, Ken Dekkers, Joris Popineau, Jeremy Riffault, John O'Sullivan, Andrew Z Haddad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jannis WesselkaemperEnergy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Division, Energy Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. janniswesselkaemper@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6824-5406
Theo RenaudGeothermal Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Naod ArayaGeothermal Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ken DekkersGeothermal Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1901-8230
Joris PopineauGeothermal Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jeremy RiffaultGeothermal Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
John O'SullivanGeothermal Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-7688
Andrew Z HaddadEnergy Technologies and Systems Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. azhaddad@lbl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9206-3505

Funding

DOE | Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy) AWDD00007865DOE | Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy | Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) DE-AC02-05CH11231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium supply chains remain heavily concentrated in hard rock and brine resources, creating significant supply risks. Geothermal brines represent an underutilized alternative, yet commercial progress is hindered by the absence of facility-scale cost assessments. Here, we present a techno-economic analysis of large-scale lithium extraction from Salton Sea geothermal brines, drawing on primary company disclosures, process patents, and brine resource modeling. Caused by varying lithium and impurity concentrations, brine dilution over time, and process configurations (e.g., production via carbonation and conversion vs. electrolysis), we find that large-scale production costs may reach ~10,000 United States dollars per ton, but increase up to 22,000 United States dollars per ton with higher certainty of brine modeling, raising concerns about economic competitiveness to conventional low-cost sources. Finally, a project feasibility-focused scenario analyses shows that leveraging brine pre-treatment by-product sales could lower long-term lithium break-even prices by ~5,000 United States dollars per ton, whereas capital cost optimization of 20% could further reduce lithium break-even prices by 10%.

Identifiers

PMID42425988
PMCPMC13478165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.