ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2026
Efficacy of Modified Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Intrafascial Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postoperative Urinary Continence Recovery.
Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was designed to expound the efficacy of a modified extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) technique involving total intrafascial resection with the standard interfascial nerve-sparing technique in patients with prostate cancer (PC), and to identify factors influencing postoperative urinary continence recovery following the modified procedure. Phase 1: A retrospective analysis compared modified (n = 100) vs. standard ELRP (n = 100) for surgical outcomes, urodynamics, erectile function, and continence recovery. Phase 2: Analysis of 400 modified ELRP patients identified independent continence recovery risk factors via logistic regression (poor-continence: n = 63; good-continence: n = 337). At 6 months, the modified group showed greater urodynamic improvement (p < 0.05). Erectile function and continence were comparable at 1/3 months but better in the modified group at 6 months (p < 0.05). Age ≥ 65 years, BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.