ArticleBMJ open2026
Mapping the use of interactive voice response (IVR) in healthcare in Africa: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAfrica faces a substantial health burden characterised by a dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases compounded by persistent health system and infrastructure constraints. Digital health interventions offer scalable opportunities to strengthen healthcare delivery. Interactive voice response (IVR), an automated telephone-based technology, shows promise across African health settings; however, existing evidence is dispersed across isolated studies and demonstrates variability in outcomes and implementation approaches. This scoping review maps existing evidence on the use of IVR in healthcare in Africa, focusing on applications, outcomes and implementation experiences. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies will include all designs that evaluate IVR-based health interventions in African healthcare settings, while non-voice digital interventions and non-empirical publications will be excluded. We will conduct a scoping review guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute and report findings using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We will systematically search bibliographic databases and grey literature from 2000 to the end of 2025. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data and chart evidence on IVR characteristics, implementation strategies, barriers and facilitators and outcomes. A third reviewer will resolve disagreements. We will synthesise findings descriptively and thematically, presenting results in tables, visual maps and an equity-focused analysis guided by PROGRESS-Plus. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required because this scoping review synthesises previously published, publicly available literature and does not involve human participants or primary data collection. We will share the findings through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations, and we will discuss the results with digital health stakeholders, clinicians and policymakers to inform future IVR work in Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.