ArticleBMJ open2026
Efficacy and safety of haemostatic agents for patients receiving antiplatelet therapy before coronary artery bypass grafting: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMost patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) receive preoperative antiplatelet therapy to reduce ischaemic events but this increases perioperative bleeding and transfusion risk. Tranexamic acid, aminocaproic acid, aprotinin and desmopressin are commonly employed to reduce such risk; however, robust direct head-to-head comparative evidence remains limited in this specific population. Therefore, we will conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare their relative efficacy and safety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 24 March 2026 for RCTs that compare these four agents versus placebo/standard care or head-to-head in adults receiving preoperative antiplatelet therapy for CABG. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias Instrument for Use in SysTematic reviews-for Randomised Controlled Trials tool. Primary outcomes will be the total perioperative volume of blood loss and the proportion of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions. Secondary outcomes will include blood product transfusion volumes, reoperation rates for bleeding or cardiac tamponade, rates of composite thromboembolic events, all-cause mortality and incidence of acute kidney injury. Pairwise random-effects meta-analyses will be performed first followed by Bayesian NMA. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve for the outcomes of interest will be used to rank the competing interventions. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework will be used to assess the quality of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to support clinical decision-making. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251235248.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.