ArticleMolecular and cellular neurosciences2026
Phenotypic screening for small molecules that lower PrP in cultured cells.
Article in Molecular and cellular neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prion protein (PrP) lowering is a validated therapeutic hypothesis in prion disease. To identify small molecules that reduce PrP levels, we performed phenotypic screening in cultured cells. To prioritize PrP specificity in our primary screen, we generated mouse N2a cells stably expressing GFP and used high content imaging analysis to select compounds that lowered PrP without affecting GFP signal or cell viability. Screening a curated library of 3492 compounds with annotated mechanisms of action identified two small molecules, EYH (PubChem CID: 71678945) and LCZ (PubChem CID: 24970350), that selectively and dose-dependently lowered PrP. Proteomics on whole cell lysates identified PrP as the #1 or #2 most potently downregulated out of 8722 proteins detected. Both compounds minimally affected Prnp mRNA, reduced expression of exogenously transfected PrP, and remained potent in non-dividing primary cells, consistent with a post-translational mechanism. Co-treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 yielded accumulation of unglycosylated PrP, demonstrating proteasome clearance of PrP. However, both compounds showed limited or no activity in human cell lines, and failed to reduce PrP in vivo after 14 days of treatment. These findings highlight the challenges associated with mechanism-agnostic phenotypic screening for PrP-lowering compounds and support prioritizing compounds with known mechanisms of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.