ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Constraints on lunge feeding: krill can clog the baleen of filter-feeding whales.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rorqual whales (Balaenopteridae) grow to exceptional size by lunging to engulf entire swarms of fish or krill, then rapidly concentrating prey using a baleen filter. A 20-m-long fin whale can engulf 60 m3 of water and 144 kg of krill in a single gulp and expel the water in 31 s, allowing the animal to make six lunges in a single 8 min dive. But there is a problem hidden in this apparently efficient scheme. Spread uniformly across the 2.9 m2 of the baleen window, 144 kg of krill forms a layer 6.3 cm thick. If the accumulated krill clog the filter, it could increase the time needed to expel water, decreasing the rate at which lunges could be made, and negatively impacting foraging efficiency. We devised a model that incorporates measurements of the hydraulic resistance of accumulating krill and the pressure applied to water in the buccal pouch by contraction of muscles and elastic rebound of blubber in the pouch's walls. Given the stress typical of mammalian muscle, the model suggests that approximately 16 min would be required to empty the buccal pouch of an average gulp of krill - twice the duration of typical foraging dives - severely reducing feeding efficiency. Filter time could be reduced to the observed 31 s if a fraction of the baleen window is maintained clear of krill, but it is unclear how that might be achieved. Important questions remain as to how baleen whales feed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.