ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Accuracy of breast density assessment using artificial intelligence by convolutional neural network for carriers of UGT1A1 polymorphisms with Gilbert's Syndrome - a pilot study.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGilbert's Syndrome (GS), an indirect hyperbilirubinemia resulting from the reduced hepatic bilirubin-glucuronyltransferase enzyme activity, influences estrogen metabolism. Polymorphisms in the UGT gene, such as those associated with GS, can alter estrogen clearance, impacting hormonal exposure and, consequently, breast density, an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Furthermore, the accumulation of estrogenic metabolites like 4-OH-estrogens, recognized as carcinogenic agents, suggests a potential increased risk of breast cancer in GS patients. Given this complex interrelationship, this pilot study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in determining breast density in postmenopausal women with GS, seeking to optimize their follow-up.
methodsThe authors conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study involving 21 patients, divided into GS and genotyped wild-type control groups. The CNN's performance was compared against radiologists' assessments.
resultsFor dense breasts in the GS group, the CNN showed 55.6% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and 77.8% accuracy. Kappa agreement was 0.381 for the GS group and 0.700 for controls (fair and good agreement, respectively). Specificity was the most representative diagnostic parameter for dense breasts.
conclusionThis pilot study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that the CNN's sensitivity in breast density assessment in women with GS may be low, while specificity seems to be high. These findings suggest the need for further validation of artificial intelligence algorithms in specific populations, such as those with GS, and that conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and wide confidence intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.