ArticlePloS one2026
A distributionally-robust bayesian adaptive EWMA chart for joint surveillance of lognormal process location and scale.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliability surveillance of safety-critical systems often involves monitoring positively skewed characteristics, such as failure rates, repair times, or material degradation paths, which are robustly modeled by the lognormal distribution. We propose a Distributionally-Robust Bayesian Adaptive EWMA (DR-BAEWMA) framework for the joint surveillance of the log-scale mean and variance under practical model and information uncertainty. Decisively departing from standard Bayesian charts that assume a perfectly specified likelihood, our architecture integrates a distributional-robustification layer using Wasserstein ambiguity sets to protect online estimates against heavy-tailed contamination and misspecified sensor noise. Operating on the log scale, the method treats process health as a latent variable within a non-stationary state-space formulation, decoupling true signals from instrumentation noise via variance-inflation surrogates derived from distributionally robust optimization (DRO) duality results. Decision-theoretic point estimates under both symmetric squared-error loss (SELF) and asymmetric Linex loss (LLF) are incorporated to support risk-sensitive monitoring priorities integrated into the alarm thresholding. We present an adaptive sampling approach that minimizes a principled cost-delay objective to estimate the optimal inspection effort online in order to account for practical problems. Robust univariate and multivariate alarms are provided by a scalar Max statistic and a multivariate Mahalanobis intensity; control limits are obtained by nested Monte Carlo calibration to guarantee that the framework maintains its specified in-control average run length (ARL0) under ambiguity and variable information density. Extensive simulation across steady-state, polluted, and cross-distributional regimes demonstrates a significantly reduced worst-case detection time as compared to conventional Bayesian and frequentist EWMA approaches. An industrial semiconductor hard-bake case study is used to illustrate implementation, robustness diagnostics utilizing the information ratio, and the effectiveness of adaptive maintenance-on-demand bursts. For real-time monitoring in safety-critical engineering applications, the framework offers an operationally tractable and mathematically rigorous instrument.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.