ArticlePloS one2026
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in pain relief during orthodontic treatment: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient adherence to orthodontic treatment depends on comfort, absence of pain, and improved quality of life. Pain and discomfort from procedures like interproximal separation or appliance activation are often underestimated by professionals. Low-level laser therapy, with minimal side effects, shows potential for pain relief in orthodontics, though its efficacy remains uncertain.
objectivesTo investigate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in controlling pain in orthodontic patients.
methodsA systematic review of randomized controlled trials with orthodontic patients assessing low-level laser therapy will be done. Studies with specific treatments, such as hybrid orthodontics with skeletal anchorage or intermaxillary elastics, will be excluded. The intervention will compare low-level laser therapy alone versus sham therapy, no treatment, or other interventions. No restrictions will apply regarding publication date, language, or patient age. Primary outcomes will be pain; secondary outcomes will be quality of life and adverse effects. Searches will be performed in Cochrane, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Scopus, plus gray literature (Google Scholar, ProQuest), reference lists, expert consultations, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved records will be merged in a reference manager, with duplicates removed, and imported into LASER AI software. Calibrated authors will independently select studies in two phases: title/abstract screening and full-text screening. Included studies will undergo narrative synthesis, and, if sufficiently homogeneous, meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed with RoB 2, and certainty of evidence graded with GRADE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.