ArticlePloS one2026
Development of Standards for Presenting and Reporting clinical InterveNtions Televisually (SPRINT) reporting guidelines: A study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideos of clinical intervention (VoCI) demonstrate medical and surgical approaches, including laparoscopy and robotics, endoscopy and interventional techniques. VoCI allow viewers to easily understand the steps of a specific procedure, enhancing clinical training through the acquisition of key perceptual and cognitive skills. However, there can be heterogeneity in video reporting, leading to the omission of critical procedural steps and suboptimal visual quality. This protocol describes the development of Standards for Presenting and Reporting clinical InterveNtions Televisually (SPRINT) guidelines through a Delphi process, which will provide a set of minimum items that should be reported by clinicians when uploading VoCI to improve their consistency and completeness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The development of SPRINT reporting guidelines will follow five key steps. In step 1, a Steering Committee has been established to lead and coordinate the consensus development process. In step 2, a scoping review of current VoCI has been performed to generate preliminary checklist items. In step 3, a diverse international panel of clinical experts, trainees, educationalists, media platform providers and patient representatives will participate in a Delphi process, seeking ≥ 70% agreement on checklist items. In step 4, the SPRINT reporting guidelines will be finalised, along with an explanation and elaboration (E&E) document. In step 5, the guidelines will be broadly disseminated to ensure effective implementation. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The project is pre-registered within the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/an2jt/) and the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.