ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Mind the gap: An embedding guide to safely travel in sequence space.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing Pathogenic Dimerization in a Misfolded Antibody Light Chain through the Design of an Inhibitory Peptide.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- BAGEL: Protein engineering via exploration of an energy landscape.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a hybrid approach combining a protein language model (pLM) with Monte Carlo (MC) sampling for generating enzyme mutants free of mutations deleterious for structural preservation. Given the amino acid sequence of the original enzyme and a set of residues for which the local environment should be conserved, i.e., the catalytic site, our approach generates mutants that differ vastly in the overall sequence while retaining the geometry of the conserved region, thereby representing promising candidates for further experimental screening. Unlike end-to-end deep-learning approaches, whose results are harder to interpret and control, the use of a well-established, classic technique such as MC sampling allows us to easily interpret the generative process as the sampling of an energy landscape determined by the pLM. In turn, such an interpretation enables us to steer this generative process and control its outcome by making use of robust statistical mechanics concepts, e.g., temperature, thereby explicitly guaranteeing certain properties of the generated mutants. We further show, through comparison to experimentally characterised chorismate mutase variants, that low embedding energy is a necessary condition for catalytic function, providing direct experimental grounding for the energy function at the core of our approach. Given the increasing relevance of generative algorithms in the design and search for novel, optimised enzymes, we believe that our results constitute an important step for the future development of this class of techniques. To facilitate experimental verification, we finally provide over 12,500 sequences in total for 13 different enzymes involved in catalytic processes ranging from biomass degradation to DNA replication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.