ArticlePloS one2026
Leveraging microcredentials for sustainability literacy in higher education: A case study of reflective thinking and learning impact in science.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microcredentials are becoming increasingly popular in higher education. Despite their growing popularity, there is limited exploration of microcredentials' potential for lifelong learning and their role in sustainability education within curricula. Furthermore, the use of and evaluation of reflective thinking linked to science and sustainability within these online offerings is unexplored. Undertaken in 2024, a large undergraduate science subject, Complex Case Studies in Science (n = 435), embedded a short microcredential titled 'Sustainability: Think, Care, Do' to foster sustainability learning outcomes. The microcredential introduces learners to key concepts of sustainability, understanding diverse worldviews, unpacking their values and how to think systemically, as well as the relevance of these literacies to their science discipline. Our paper explores the learning of a participating cohort of undergraduate students (n = 33) in developing sustainability literacies through this online intervention to culminate in a final reflective assessment of the subject. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we analysed the students' reflective assessment task. Our findings demonstrate how an online microcredential enhanced science students' understanding of sustainability, re-evaluation of their daily practices and professional identities, and the development of literacies that grapple with complexity and interdisciplinary solutions across sustainability domains. We also quantified their engagement through behavioural analytics, which varied greatly as expected with an independent self-paced online course. We share these insights as a blueprint for higher education practitioners to integrate online sustainability microcredentials into their curricula at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.