ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Time to recovery from Obstetric Fistula and its predictors among patients admitted to Hamlin Fistula Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A survival analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstetric Fistula (OBF) remains a devastating maternal condition in Ethiopia, causing significant physical suffering, social isolation and psychological traumas among affected women. Despite its burden, only a limited number of healthcare facilities in Ethiopia provide surgical interventions. Furthermore, there is a scarcity of evidence regarding the time to recovery from OBF and its predictors in treatment centers. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the time to recovery from OBF and its predictors among patients admitted to Hamlin Fistula Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A Hospital based retrospective cohort study was conducted among 513 women treated for OBF from January 2017 to June 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to estimate the distribution of recovery time, and the log-rank test was utilized to assess the experience of recovery time among different levels of categorical variables. Bivariate and multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses were conducted. The overall recovery rate was 74.7%, (95%CI: 71.1, 78.2), with a median recovery-time from OBF was 5.9 weeks (95%CI: 5.1, 6.6). Receiving physiotherapy after surgery (AHR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.13-3.02) and having a fistula length of 2.2-4 cm (AHR: 5.23, 95%CI: 1.17-12.33) were found to be predictors of faster recovery for OBF. Conversely, women with urethral damage (AHR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.25-0.76) or severe vaginal scarring (AHR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.40-0.89) experienced delayed recovery from OBF. Only 7.3% of OBF patients received physiotherapy despite 85% faster recovery. Based on the findings, the median recovery time from OBF was 5.9 weeks. Therefore, scaling-up postoperative physiotherapy for all OBF patients, early identification, and providing counselling and specialized care for women with urethral injury or severe vaginal scarring could improve recovery time from OBF. These findings also highlighted the critical importance of individualized rehabilitation services in fistula treatment centers to optimize patient recovery and overall quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.