Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42424369›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Industrialization of sandwich composite panels for portable outdoor tabletops.

Wen Yu, Robert Langer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wen YuTopsun National Industrial Design Center, Zhejiang Hengfeng Top leisure Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9699-0469
Robert LangerFaculty of Natural Sciences II, Institute of Chemistry, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sandwich composite panels offer a promising pathway for developing lightweight yet mechanically robust portable outdoor tabletops, but their industrialization outside traditional aerospace and transportation sectors remains challenging. This study investigates how sandwich composites can be adapted for mass‑market outdoor tabletops by linking market‑driven requirements to engineering design decisions. Five representative panel configurations were developed, varying in core materials, face‑sheet systems, surface finishing, edge‑sealing strategies, and fastening solutions. A structured evaluation matrix was established to assess both material‑level and product‑level performance, aligned with customer‑relevant requirements, applicable standards, and company‑defined acceptance criteria. Results show that industrial feasibility is governed not by any single metric but by the coupled interactions among material selection, surface durability, moisture‑resistant edge sealing, fastening reliability, and manufacturability-cost trade‑offs. Blind rivets emerged as a practical fastening solution, while surface durability and thermal stability were strongly influenced by the combined behavior of finishing chemistry and substrate. The findings establish practical architecture-performance relationships and outline viable industrialization pathways for mass‑market portable outdoor tabletops based on sandwich composite panels.

Identifiers

PMID42424369
PMCPMC13349161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.