ArticlePloS one2026
Household income and academic performance in Korean adolescents: A longitudinal test of dual investment pathways.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Building on the Family Investment Model (FIM), the present study examined how household income shapes adolescents' academic performance through material and relational investments within the Korean educational context. Drawing on three waves of data from the nationally representative Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey 2018 (N = 2,387), we estimated a longitudinal parallel mediation model that accounted for baseline levels of each construct and demographic covariates. Results indicated that household income predicted higher private educational expenditure but was not associated with parent-child communication. Indirect effects revealed that household income influenced academic performance through material investment in private education, whereas the relational pathway was not significant. However, the difference between the two indirect pathways did not reach statistical significance. These findings suggest that private educational expenditure may represent one important pathway linking family economic resources to adolescents' perceived academic performance in the Korean educational context. These findings underscore how household economic resources are differentially converted into educational advantages through family investment processes, highlighting implications for understanding income-based educational stratification in highly competitive educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.