ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Who chooses telehealth? A cross-sectional cohort study of diabetic patients in outpatient clinic follow-up.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05183685 (Outcomes of a Risk Assessment and Management Program Using Telecare Consultation Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in General Out-patient Clinic), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcomes of a Risk Assessment and Management Program Using Telecare Consultation Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in General Out-patient Clinic: A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telehealth, the remote delivery of healthcare services via digital communication technologies, effectively manages diabetes, yet factors influencing its use-particularly in primary care-remain underexplored. This cross-sectional study investigates factors affecting participation and continuity of telehealth services among 1,094 diabetic patients in General Outpatient Clinics (GOPC). Two dependent variables-participation and continuity-were assessed at recruitment (T1) and post-program (T3). Socio-demographic, clinical, and eHealth-related characteristics served as independent variables. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were utilized, including interaction terms for moderation effects. Key findings indicated that initial participation was significantly associated with eHealth literacy, health-related internet use, and mobile technology confidence. For continuity, significant predictors included age, care frequency, and income source, with care frequency's positive effect diminishing as eHealth literacy increased. Overall, this study highlights the importance of digital capabilities and household support. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), the results suggest that certain UTAUT2 constructs, such as effort expectancy and facilitating conditions, may be particularly relevant for understanding telehealth engagement in this context. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05183685) on 10 Dec 2022.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.