ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Anthropogenic landscapes and vector-borne disease dynamics: Unveiling the complex interplay between Human Footprint and disease transmission in Colombia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic landscape transformations are fundamentally reshaping the epidemiology of vector-borne diseases (VBDs), yet their causal impacts remain poorly quantified across diverse ecological and socio-economic contexts. This study evaluates the causal effect of the Human Footprint (HFP) on the transmission dynamics of malaria, dengue, and visceral leishmaniasis in Colombia. We conducted an ecological analysis using municipal-level retrospective data from Colombia's National Public Health Surveillance System (SIVIGILA, 2007-2019). Epidemiological records were integrated with environmental and socio-economic indicators, and a Double Machine Learning (DML) framework was applied to estimate the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) and Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) of HFP on excess disease cases. Model robustness was assessed through refutation tests and non-parametric sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding. A one-standard-deviation increase in HFP significantly reduced the probability of excess malaria cases by 7.6 percentage points (ATE = -0.076, 95% CI: -0.094 - -0.058), an effect that was more pronounced in socio-economically deprived municipalities and modulated by temperature and precipitation gradients. Conversely, the ATE for dengue and visceral leishmaniasis was not different from zero. Robustness tests suggest the presence of residual bias, but the sensitivity test points to a low plausibility of an unobserved confounder. These findings underscore the necessity of integrating HFP monitoring into public health planning to design context-specific, multi-sectoral interventions that address the evolving landscape of VBD risk in rapidly transforming regions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.