ArticlePloS one2026
Protocol for a Delphi consensus study to identify priority characteristics of integrated care for individuals with severe mental illness and comorbid physical disorders in Europe.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndividuals with severe mental illness (SMI) experience persistent and complex physical health needs that remain insufficiently addressed. While integrated care represents a promising solution, there is no consensus among stakeholders regarding what constitutes best-practice organizational models for this population. As part of the European Mental and Physical Health Initiative for People with Severe Mental Disorders (EU-MIND), this study aims to identify expert consensus on the key characteristics of integrated care models for individuals with SMI to support their sustainable implementation across Europe.
methodsThis study will use an online Delphi process, with up to three rounds, to engage stakeholders from six European countries (Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Poland, and Sweden). Participants will include people living with SMI, their relatives, health and care professionals, public decision-makers and institutional actors with relevant experience related to the research topic. A minimum sample size of 33 participants per country will be targeted, with the aim of ensuring balanced representation across the different categories of participants. They will be asked to rate the importance of potential key characteristics of integrated care models using Likert scales. A characteristic will be considered to have reached consensus if more than 70% of the respondents agree on its degree of importance. This study complies with the Delphistar reporting guidelines for Delphi studies and has received ethical approval from the Aix-Marseille University Ethics Committee and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. DISCUSSION: This study will provide expert-based guidance on the core characteristics of integrated care for individuals living with SMI. By capturing diverse stakeholder perspectives across countries and healthcare systems, it will help define shared priorities and inform future service design, implementation and policy, supporting sustainable and context-sensitive care development in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.