ArticlePloS one2026
Theoretical assessment design at a South African school of nursing: A multimethod qualitative exploration.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTheoretical assessment design is crucial in nursing education, ensuring students develop cognitive and problem-solving skills for clinical practice. However, misalignment with learning outcomes and inconsistent cognitive level distribution remain complex issues. METHODS AND
findingsThis multimethod qualitative study explored theoretical assessment design in a South African nursing school through in-depth interviews with nurse educators and a document review of moderators' reports. Stratified purposive sampling ensured diverse representation across National Qualifications Framework Levels 5-8. Data saturation was reached after nine interviews, analysed using Creswell and Creswell's six-step thematic framework. The document review analysed 70 moderation reports (22 internal and 48 external) from 2015 to 2019, focusing on feedback related to final theoretical assessments. Content analysis, following Krippendorff's framework, was used to identify themes and patterns. Findings revealed an overemphasis on lower-order cognitive skills (Bloom's taxonomy), inconsistent question distribution, and misalignment with national qualification standards. Educators acknowledged these issues but cited time constraints, inadequate training, and institutional pressures as contributing factors. Moderation reports confirmed assessment inconsistencies, emphasising the need for better alignment with constructive alignment principles. Triangulation of data highlighted a gap between perceived best practices and actual assessment quality, suggesting assessments do not fully support higher-order cognitive skill development.
conclusionTo improve the validity and reliability of theoretical assessments, nursing programmes should prioritise training in assessment design, strengthen alignment with learning outcomes, and implement moderation strategies to address inconsistencies. These findings contribute to the broader discourse on improving assessment practices in nursing education globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.